

Counselling
In recent years, the mental health field has been swept up in a cultural push toward “efficiency.” Short‑term, manualized, symptom‑focused therapy models often four to six, or eight to twelve sessions, that are promoted as the gold standard. Much of this trend can be traced back to the structure of Employee and Family Assistance Programs (EFAPs), which were designed around organizational cost‑containment rather than clinical depth.
At Wasson Counselling & Consulting, we work from a different lens. Human beings are not problems to be solved in six sessions. We are relational, complex, layered, and shaped by histories that deserve more than a quick fix. Long‑term therapy honours that reality.
This blog is about the case for long‑term therapy, grounded in research, theory, and decades of clinical experience. It also includes a thoughtful critique of the brief‑therapy model that has become the default in many workplaces. Long‑term therapy honours the complexity of people’s lives, relationships, histories, and nervous systems. Below is a research‑informed case for why long‑term therapy matters, and why brief therapy, while useful in specific contexts, cannot be the universal standard of care.
Healing Happens in Relationship, Not in Rush
One of the most consistent findings across psychotherapy research is that the therapeutic relationship is central to positive outcomes. While the studies retrieved in the search focus more on treatment duration than relational factors, they collectively highlight that short‑term models often fail to demonstrate clear superiority, and in many cases, the evidence is simply inconclusive (Juul et al., 2023).
This matters because when the evidence is unclear, the default should not be “shorter is better.” Instead, it invites us to consider what clients actually need:
Time to build trust
Time to explore patterns that have developed over years
Time to feel safe enough to be honest
Time to integrate new ways of relating
Therapy that is focused on client pace and cadence, creates the relational container necessary for this depth of work. Brief therapy, by design, limits it. By ushering a person through the process before readiness, counselling can repeat patterns that haven’t served someone, force closeness before it develops naturally with a therapist and ultimately push a client to disclosure before safety is established.
Complex Problems Require More Than Short‑Term Solutions
The research on long‑term interventions, shows that sustained therapeutic engagement improves mental health outcomes across a wide range of concerns (Gerstl et al., 2024). While this research focuses on younger populations, the implications are clear - complex, chronic, or relationally rooted concerns benefit from longer‑term support.
Similarly, long‑term follow‑up of adults with treatment‑resistant depression shows that adding longer protocols to care leads to sustained improvements over 3–5 years (Wiles et al., 2016). This reinforces what many clinicians know intuitively, when signs of distress are entrenched, and experiences are layered, short‑term therapy is rarely enough.
Brief Therapy Was Built Around System Limitations - Not Clinical Wisdom
Let’s be very honest about something here. Brief therapy models did not emerge because they were proven to be the most effective. They emerged because:
EFAPs needed predictable, low‑cost service delivery
Organizations wanted quick, measurable outcomes
Insurance systems required short‑term, manualized interventions
The research confirms that short‑term therapy is not consistently superior, and in many cases, the evidence is too limited or too low‑certainty to draw conclusions (Juul et al., 2023). Yet these models continue to dominate because they are administratively convenient and less of a financial commitment. In Saskatchewan this has become evident in the way that publicly funded mental health systems run. Gone are the days where skilled clinicians could spend adequate time working with their clients to address issues. Now the standard has become a 4-6 session model where so-called “high risk clients” are streamed in and “low intensity clients” are streamed out - to presumably suffer until such time as crisis emerges and the system deems them risky enough from a liability standpoint to warrant care.
This is not a clinical argument. It is a budgetary one.
When we treat brief therapy as the default, we risk:
Oversimplifying human suffering
Pathologizing clients who don’t “improve fast enough”
Ignoring systemic contributors to distress
Reinforcing the belief that healing should be quick and inexpensive
So, let’s expand on this.
When brief therapy becomes the assumed standard, it can unintentionally reduce complex emotional pain to something that should be “fixable” in a handful of sessions. Human experiences (trauma, grief, identity struggles, long‑term patterns, systemic harm) often unfold over years. Treating them as short‑term problems risks flattening the depth of what people carry and can leave clients feeling misunderstood or minimized. If the model assumes rapid progress, anyone who needs more time may be labeled resistant, unmotivated, or “too complex.” This shifts responsibility onto the client rather than acknowledging that healing is nonlinear, relational, and deeply individual. It can also shame people for not meeting an arbitrary timeline that never fit their reality in the first place.
Brief therapy often focuses on individual symptoms and coping strategies, which can obscure the broader forces shaping someone’s suffering - poverty, racism, discrimination, unsafe housing, family systems, community violence, or chronic stress. When therapy is rushed, there’s less room to explore how external conditions impact internal experiences, and clients may be left feeling like their pain is solely a personal failing. A cultural expectation grows if therapy is “done right,” it should be efficient, low‑cost, and neatly resolved. This reinforces a productivity‑driven view of mental health that doesn’t match how real healing works. It can also pressure therapists to deliver results on a timeline that prioritizes systems and budgets over human needs, ultimately devaluing the depth and time required for meaningful change. Long‑term therapy resists this pressure by honouring the pace of real human change.
Long‑Term Therapy Supports Integration, Not Just Intervention
Short‑term therapy often focuses on skills acquisition - grounding techniques, reframing concerns, communication strategies. These are valuable, but they are not the whole story.
Long‑term therapy supports:
Integration of skills into daily life
Repetition and reinforcement
Exploration of setbacks without shame
Identity shifts, not just behaviour shifts
Sustained improvement
This means that rather than forcing change without adequate background, depth, or readiness - change can be meaningful and lasting. There is room for set backs without feeling as though they represent a character flaw or failure and much like issues can become entrenched so to can the solutions and remedy
Why Saskatchewan Context Matters
In Saskatchewan, as with most communities, people often carry emotional landscapes shaped by history, culture, and the demands of their work. These realities deserve to be named with care and depth. Across many Saskatchewan families and communities, trauma is not a single event, it is a story passed down through generations. This includes the intergenerational impacts of colonization, residential schools, forced relocation, poverty, and family systems shaped by silence rather than support. This includes patterns of emotional suppression, hardship, and “just get through it” coping strategies that can echo across decades. Long‑term therapy creates space to understand these inherited patterns, interrupt them, and choose something different for the next generation.
Agriculture, veterinary medicine, first responders and healthcare are professions built on responsibility, long hours, and the expectation of being available no matter what. Calving season, harvest, emergencies, shift work, and understaffed teams create chronic stress that rarely lets up. People in these roles often push through exhaustion because others depend on them. Over time, this can erode wellbeing, relationships, and identity. These pressures cannot be resolved in a handful of sessions - they require sustained support, reflection, and recalibration.
Professional Burnout
Burnout in Saskatchewan’s helping and service professions is not an individual failure - it is a systemic reality. Healthcare workers, educators, social workers, veterinarians, and first responders often carry moral distress, empathy fatigue, and the emotional residue of caring for others in under‑resourced environments. Burnout is not simply “stress”; it is a depletion of meaning, connection, and internal capacity. Long‑term therapy offers a place to rebuild from the inside out, rather than simply coping until the next crisis. Burnout in this context is not simply “stress.” It is a slow erosion of meaning, connection, and internal resources. It shows up as emotional depletion, a shrinking window of tolerance, a sense of disconnection from one’s work or identity, and a growing difficulty accessing the compassion that once felt natural. People often describe feeling like they are functioning on autopilot, bracing for the next crisis, or carrying a level of responsibility that never fully lets them rest.
Long‑term therapy offers a space to rebuild from the inside out rather than merely coping until the next breaking point. It provides the continuity needed to process accumulated moral distress, to understand the personal and systemic patterns that contribute to overextension, and to reconnect with values, boundaries, and a sense of self that may have been overshadowed by chronic demand. In a sustained therapeutic relationship, professionals can explore the emotional impact of their work, integrate experiences that have been set aside in the name of “getting through,” and develop a more sustainable internal architecture for doing work that is meaningful but taxing. Long‑term therapy becomes not just a place to recover, but a place to reorient toward resilience, clarity, and a way of working that honours both the person and the profession.
Cultural norms of self‑reliance and emotional suppression
Many Saskatchewan communities, especially rural ones, are shaped by histories of farming, resource work, and “getting through” harsh seasons with limited support. Independence, stoicism, and not “making a fuss” are often seen as strengths, even markers of character. People learn early to push through pain, to keep working, and to prioritize others’ needs over their own. While these values can foster resilience and community pride, they can also make it harder to ask for help, to name emotional pain, or to admit that something is no longer manageable.
In this context, vulnerability can feel risky or even disloyal. Someone might worry about being seen as weak, dramatic, or ungrateful, especially if others in their family or community have “had it worse.” Over time, distress that is minimized, joked away, or dismissed becoming woven into a person’s sense of normal. Exhaustion, numbness, or quiet despair can start to feel like just “how life is.” The longer this goes unnamed, the more deeply ingrained the patterns of self-silencing and over-functioning become.
Long-term therapy offers a counter-cultural space in which emotional experience is not only allowed but actively invited. It is a place where tears, anger, confusion, and grief are treated as information rather than problems to hide. With time, people can begin to notice what they feel, put words to long-ignored experiences, and understand how community norms have shaped their relationship with their own needs. In an ongoing therapeutic relationship, there is room to experiment with new ways of being: asking for support, setting limits, and honouring internal signals instead of overriding them. For many in rural Saskatchewan, this sustained, respectful attention to their inner world can be the first time their emotional life is treated as worthy of care, not as something to “tough out” alone.
Why These Are Not Six‑Session Problems
As mentioned above, these realities are layered, relational, and often decades in the making. They are shaped by family systems, community norms, work cultures, trauma histories, and the accumulated impact of coping in environments that have not always allowed space for emotional expression. Patterns of over-functioning, self-silencing, or chronic vigilance do not appear overnight. They develop slowly, often as adaptive responses to circumstances where people had limited choices or support. By the time someone seeks help, these patterns are usually deeply ingrained into their identity, relationships, and nervous system.
Because of this, they cannot be addressed through quick fixes, worksheets, or symptom-focused interventions. Short-term strategies may offer temporary relief, but they rarely reach the roots of what a person has carried or the meaning those experiences hold. Sustainable change requires time to understand how these patterns formed, how they have been reinforced, and what it feels like to try something different. It also requires a space where the person does not have to perform competence or minimize their pain.
This is where long-term therapy becomes essential. It provides the continuity needed to build trust, to explore experiences that have been avoided or normalized, and to hold the full complexity of a person’s story without rushing toward solutions. In a sustained therapeutic relationship, people can experiment with new ways of relating, revisit themes as they arise in real time, and integrate insights at a pace that honours their history. Long-term therapy allows for depth, nuance, and the kind of relational safety that makes genuine transformation possible.
What Long‑Term Therapy Makes Possible
Long‑term therapy provides space for the kind of work that unfolds slowly, gently, and sustainably. This is work that honours the nervous system, the relational history, and the lived realities of Saskatchewan communities. It recognizes that healing is not a linear process and that people often arrive carrying years -sometimes generations - of patterned responses shaped by family systems, community expectations, and the demands of rural and professional life. These patterns cannot be rushed or forced open; they need room to be understood, revisited, and integrated at a pace that feels safe.
In long‑term therapy, there is time to build the kind of trust that allows someone to move beyond surface‑level coping and into deeper exploration. The nervous system can gradually shift out of reactivity, learning what it feels like to experience steadiness rather than urgency. Sessions are not about “fixing” a problem in six weeks but about creating a consistent relational environment where the body and mind can slowly recalibrate. This is especially important in Saskatchewan, where many people have been taught to override their internal signals in order to keep working, keep caregiving, or keep the farm or clinic running.
Long‑term therapy also makes space for the relational layers of healing. Many clients have never had a relationship where their emotions were met with curiousity rather than judgment, or where their needs did not feel like a burden. The therapeutic relationship becomes a place to practice new ways of being - setting boundaries, expressing needs, tolerating closeness, or allowing themselves to be supported. These shifts take time, repetition, and the safety of knowing the relationship will still be there next week, next month, and next season.
Finally, long‑term therapy respects the broader context of Saskatchewan life. It acknowledges the pressures of rural work cycles, the impact of isolation, the weight of community expectations, and the reality that many people have been carrying more than they could name. Sustainable healing requires a space that understands these realities and does not rush them. Long‑term therapy offers that space - one that is steady, spacious, and grounded enough to hold the full arc of a person’s story.
Unlearning survival strategies
Many people carry coping strategies that were once necessary for survival. In childhood, in high‑pressure workplaces, in caregiving roles, or in communities where emotional expression was discouraged, these strategies served a purpose. Perfectionism may have helped someone avoid criticism. Emotional numbing may have protected them from overwhelming experiences. Overfunctioning may have been the only way to keep a family, farm, or workplace afloat. People‑pleasing may have reduced conflict or kept relationships stable. Shutting down may have been the safest option when vulnerability was not met with care.
Over time, these strategies become so practiced that they feel like fixed parts of a person’s identity. Someone might say, “I’m just the responsible one,” “I don’t feel things deeply,” or “I can’t let people down,” without realizing these are learned responses shaped by context, not inherent traits. What once kept us safe can eventually limit our capacity for connection, rest, and authenticity. The nervous system continues to operate as if the old conditions are still present, even when life has changed.
Long‑term therapy creates the space needed to explore these patterns with curiousity rather than judgment. It allows people to trace the origins of their coping strategies, understand the environments that shaped them, and recognize the wisdom embedded in how they learned to survive. This understanding is not about pathologizing the past but about honouring the ingenuity of the strategies that helped them get through.
With time, people can begin to experiment with new ways of being that are more aligned with their current lives. Instead of perfectionism, they can cultivate self‑compassion. Instead of emotional numbing, they can build capacity to feel safely. Instead of overfunctioning, they can practice boundaries and shared responsibility. Instead of people‑pleasing, they can explore authentic communication. Instead of shutting down, they can learn to stay present in relationships that feel safe. It creates space to explore the idea that being compassionate or engaged in our lives does not mean we abandon ourselves in the process.
These shifts require repetition, relational safety, and a pace that respects the nervous system. Long‑term therapy offers that steady container. It supports clients in moving from survival‑based patterns toward more flexible, life‑giving ways of relating to themselves and others.
Rebuilding relational patterns
Patterns in relationships such as withdrawal, conflict avoidance, caretaking, and mistrust rarely emerge in adulthood without a history. They are often rooted in early attachment experiences, family dynamics, cultural expectations, or environments where emotional safety was inconsistent or unavailable. Over years, these patterns become reinforced through repetition - the same roles taken on in families of origin show up in workplaces, partnerships, and friendships. What began as adaptive strategies to maintain connection or reduce harm can eventually limit a person’s capacity for closeness, assertiveness, or trust.
Insight alone is not enough to shift these long‑standing relational patterns. Most people already know they avoid conflict or overextend themselves; the challenge is that their nervous system reacts as if the old conditions are still present. Changing these patterns requires more than understanding them intellectually. It requires practicing new relational behaviours in real time, within a relationship that is steady enough to tolerate discomfort, missteps, and repair.
This is where long‑term therapy becomes uniquely powerful. The therapeutic relationship offers a consistent, reliable space where clients can safely explore how they show up with another person. They can notice when they withdraw, when they brace for criticism, when they over‑accommodate, or when mistrust surfaces. These moments are not failures; they are opportunities for awareness and growth. Over time, clients experience what it feels like to be met with steadiness rather than judgment, curiosity rather than defensiveness, and repair rather than rupture.
Long‑term therapy allows clients to internalize new relational templates and experiences of secure connection that may not have been available earlier in life. Through repeated interactions, they learn that conflict can be navigated without abandonment, that needs can be expressed without backlash, and that closeness does not require self‑erasure. These experiences gradually reshape the nervous system’s expectations of relationship, making new patterns possible outside the therapy room.
In this way, long‑term therapy becomes not just a place to talk about relationships, but a place to practice them. It offers the time, safety, and relational depth needed to transform patterns that have been decades in the making.
Trauma work takes time
Trauma work cannot be rushed. The nervous system does not respond to pressure, urgency, or intellectual insight alone. It responds to safety, predictability, and the gradual expansion of capacity. For many people, especially those with complex, developmental, or cumulative trauma, the body has learned to survive by bracing, shutting down, or disconnecting. Before any trauma processing can occur, the nervous system needs time to learn that it no longer has to stay in a constant state of protection.
This means developing grounding skills, building internal and external resources, and experiencing repeated moments of safety in relationship. These foundations cannot be built in a handful of sessions. They require consistency, repetition, and a therapeutic environment where the client is not pushed beyond what their system can tolerate.
Long‑term therapy allows trauma work to be paced and titrated. Instead of diving into overwhelming memories or emotions, the therapist and client can approach them in small, manageable pieces - moving back and forth between activation and regulation. This prevents retraumatization and supports the gradual integration of experiences that were once too much to hold. The therapist can attune to subtle shifts in the client’s body, voice, and affect, adjusting the pace in real time to ensure the work remains within the client’s window of tolerance.
For clients with complex or cumulative trauma, people who have lived through chronic stress, relational wounds, or environments where safety was inconsistent - this slow, steady approach is essential. Their nervous systems often need extended time to trust, to soften, and to believe that connection can be safe. Long‑term therapy provides the continuity required for this trust to develop. It offers a relationship where ruptures can be repaired, where emotional risk is met with steadiness, and where the client can experience what it feels like to be supported rather than overwhelmed.
In this way, long‑term therapy becomes not just a place to process trauma, but a place to rebuild the internal architecture that trauma disrupted. It supports healing that is sustainable, embodied, and grounded in the client’s own pace and capacity.
Developing emotional literacy
Many people were never taught the language of emotions. In many families and communities, especially those shaped by rural life, caregiving roles, or cultural norms of stoicism, emotions were managed through silence, distraction, or “getting on with it.” Children learn what is modelled - that anger should be swallowed, sadness should be hidden, and fear should be pushed aside. As adults, they may sense when something feels wrong - tightness in the chest, irritability, heaviness, restlessness - but they lack the vocabulary to name what is happening inside. Without language, emotional experience becomes vague and confusing, something to endure rather than understand.
This absence of emotional literacy is not a personal flaw. It is the natural outcome of environments where feelings were not named, validated, or explored. When people grow up without emotional modelling, they often rely on broad categories like “fine,” “stressed,” or “tired,” even when their internal world is far more nuanced. They may misinterpret emotional cues as character flaws (“I’m too sensitive”), physical problems (“I’m just exhausted”), or moral failings (“I shouldn’t feel this way”). Over time, this disconnect can make it difficult to advocate for needs, set boundaries, or recognize early signs of overwhelm.
Emotional literacy develops gradually, through reflection, modelling, and practice. It requires slowing down enough to notice internal signals, experimenting with language that captures the felt sense, and having those attempts met with curiosity rather than dismissal. This is not a skill that can be mastered quickly or through worksheets alone. It takes repetition, relational safety, and the steady presence of someone who can help translate the internal experience into words.
Long‑term therapy provides the conditions needed for this learning to take root. Session by session, clients begin to map their emotional landscape - distinguishing frustration from fear, grief from exhaustion, shame from sadness. They learn how emotions show up in their body, how they shift in relationship, and how to respond to them with care rather than avoidance. Over time, the therapist’s attuned language becomes internalized, giving clients a richer, more precise vocabulary for their inner world.
For many people, especially those who grew up in environments where emotions were minimized or pathologized, this process is transformative. Emotional literacy becomes a foundation for self‑understanding, healthier relationships, and more intentional choices. Long‑term therapy offers the time, consistency, and relational depth needed to build this skill in a way that is meaningful, sustainable, and deeply human.
Navigating identity shifts and life transitions
Identity is not static. It shifts and reshapes itself as people move through caregiving roles, career changes, grief, parenting, aging, and the natural evolution of values and relationships. In Saskatchewan, these transitions are often intertwined with community expectations, family responsibilities, and the rhythms of rural life. Someone may step into a caregiving role for aging parents, take over a family farm, leave a long‑held profession, or navigate the loss of a partner or community member. Each transition brings its own mix of uncertainty, grief, disorientation, and possibility. These moments often require a renegotiation of one’s sense of self who we are now, who we no longer are, and who we are becoming.
These identity shifts can feel destabilizing. Long‑held roles may no longer fit. Values that once guided decisions may feel outdated or misaligned. Relationships may change as people grow in different directions. Even positive transitions like becoming a parent, stepping into leadership, or reclaiming long‑neglected parts of oneself can bring emotional complexity. Many people describe feeling unmoored, as if the internal map they once relied on no longer applies.
Long‑term therapy offers a stable, grounded space to explore these shifts with depth and intention. It allows clients to slow down enough to notice what is emerging, to grieve what has been lost, and to make meaning of the transitions they are living through. Over time, therapy becomes a place where people can try on new identities, question old narratives, and reconnect with parts of themselves that may have been overshadowed by duty, survival, or expectation. This work cannot be rushed; it unfolds through reflection, relational safety, and the steady presence of someone who can hold the complexity without pushing for quick answers.
At Wasson Counselling & Consulting, we see long‑term therapy as an act of relational justice. It challenges the idea that people should be “efficiently treated” or reduced to symptoms. Instead, it honours the full humanity of each person - their history, their context, their relationships, and their evolving identity. Long‑term therapy creates space for people to be known, understood, and supported as they grow into lives that feel more aligned, intentional, and authentically their own.
Long‑Term Therapy Is Not Indulgent, It’s Evidence‑Based and Humane
Why Long‑Term Therapy Matters
Long‑term therapy honours the full complexity of being human. It creates space for the slow, relational, integrative work that simply cannot happen in a compressed, symptom‑focused model. Each dimension - complexity, relationship, safety, integration, identity and growth, reflects what long‑term therapy makes possible - especially for people navigating layered histories, relational patterns, or chronic stress.
Human distress rarely has a single cause or a quick solution. Our stories are shaped by family systems, culture, trauma, identity, relationships, and the environments we move through. Long‑term therapy acknowledges that complexity instead of reducing it to a checklist of symptoms. It allows clients to explore the deeper patterns beneath their struggles, understand how these patterns developed, and experiment with new ways of being over time. This is especially important when concerns are longstanding, relational, or rooted in experiences that unfolded over years.
The therapeutic relationship is not a backdrop, it is the intervention. Trust, attunement, and emotional safety take time to build, especially for clients who have been hurt, dismissed, or misunderstood in past relationships. Long‑term therapy allows the relationship itself to become a corrective emotional experience, a place where clients can practice vulnerability, repair ruptures, and internalize new relational templates. This is work that cannot be rushed. Safety is not created by reassurance alone; it is created through consistency, predictability, and the slow accumulation of positive experiences. Many clients need time to test whether the therapeutic space can truly hold their story. Long‑term therapy provides a stable container where clients can move at a pace that honours their nervous system, their history, and their readiness. Safety is not a prerequisite for therapy, it is something built together. Something therapists should be emphasizing long before intervention of any other kind.
Beyond this, learning a new skill is one thing; integrating it into daily life is another. Long‑term therapy supports the ongoing practice, reflection, and adjustment required for real change. Clients can return to themes, revisit setbacks without shame, and deepen their understanding of themselves over time. Integration is the difference between “I know this tool exists” and “I can live differently now.” Long‑term therapy makes that possible. Many people come to therapy not just to reduce symptoms, but to understand who they are, what they value, and how they want to move through the world. Identity work unfolds slowly. It requires curiousity, reflection, and the freedom to explore multiple versions of oneself without pressure. Long‑term therapy supports clients as they make meaning of their experiences, renegotiate old narratives, and step into more authentic ways of being. However, growth is rarely linear. It involves experimentation, missteps, insight, and recalibration. Long‑term therapy honours this natural rhythm. It allows clients to build resilience, deepen self‑awareness, and cultivate the internal resources needed for lasting change. Growth is not about “fixing” oneself, it is about expanding one’s capacity to live with intention, connection, and self‑compassion.
The Heart of It
People deserve more than “symptom management”.
They deserve a therapeutic space that honours the full complexity of their lives, not just the parts that feel urgent or disruptive. Quick fixes can offer temporary relief, but they rarely touch the deeper patterns shaped by history, relationships, identity, and the nervous system. Real change asks for time, safety, and a relationship that can hold the truth of someone’s experience without rushing or reducing it.
People deserve depth, continuity, and a therapeutic relationship that can hold the full arc of their story - past, present, and future. A space where they can explore what has shaped them, understand how old patterns still show up, and slowly build new ways of relating to themselves and others. A space where trust is earned, not assumed. A space where the work can unfold at a pace that respects the nervous system and honours the realities of their life.
Long‑term therapy makes that possible. It creates room for the slow, relational, integrative work that cannot happen in compressed models of care. It allows for repair, for experimentation, for returning to themes with greater clarity. It supports not only coping, but growth, meaning‑making, and the possibility of living with more steadiness and intention.
Whether you’re an individual or couple looking for support or a counsellor who is seeking clinical consultation, Wasson Counselling & Consulting is here to support you.
Warmly,
Erin
American Psychological Association. (2012). Recognition of psychotherapy effectiveness. https://www.apa.org/about/policy/resolution-psychotherapy
American Psychological Association. (2012, August 9). Research shows psychotherapy is effective but underutilized [Press release]. https://www.apa.org/news/press/releases/2012/08/psychotherapy-effective
American Psychological Association. (n.d.). How long will it take for treatment to work? https://www.apa.org/ptsd-guideline/patients-and-families/length-treatment
Gerstl, B., Ahinkorah, B. O., Nguyen, T. P., John, J. R., Hawker, P., Winata, T., Brice, F., Bowden, M., & Eapen, V. (2024). Evidence-based long term interventions targeting acute mental health presentations for children and adolescents: Systematic review. Frontiers in Psychiatry.
Juul, S., Jakobsen, J. C., Jørgensen, C. K., Poulsen, S., Sørensen, P., & Simonsen, S. (2023). The difference between shorter- versus longer-term psychotherapy for adult mental health disorders: A systematic review with meta-analysis. BMC Psychiatry.
Knekt, P., Heinonen, E., Härkäpää, K., Järvikoski, A., Virtala, E., Rissanen, J., Lindfors, O., & Helsinki Psychotherapy Study Group. (2015). Randomized trial on the effectiveness of long‑ and short‑term psychotherapy on psychosocial functioning and quality of life during a 5‑year follow‑up. Psychiatry Research, 229(1–2), 381–388. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.psychres.2015.05.113
Knekt, P., Lindfors, O., Laaksonen, M. A., Renlund, C., Haaramo, P., & Helsinki Psychotherapy Study Group. (2011). Effectiveness of short‑term and long‑term psychotherapy on work ability and functional capacity: A randomized clinical trial. Journal of Affective Disorders, 134(1–3), 172–179. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jad.2011.05.028
Leichsenring, F., & Rabung, S. (2008). Effectiveness of long‑term psychodynamic psychotherapy: A meta‑analysis. JAMA, 300(13), 1551–1565. https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.300.13.1551
Shedler, J. (2010). The efficacy of psychodynamic psychotherapy. American Psychologist, 65(2), 98–109. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0018378
van Dis, E. A. M., van Veen, S. C., Hagenaars, M. A., et al. (2019). Long-term outcomes of cognitive behavioral therapy for anxiety-related disorders: A systematic review and meta-analysis. JAMA Psychiatry.
Wiles, N. J., Thomas, L., Turner, N., Garfield, K., Kounali, D., Campbell, J., et al. (2016). Long-term effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of cognitive behavioural therapy as an adjunct to pharmacotherapy for treatment-resistant depression in primary care: Follow-up of the CoBalT randomised controlled trial. The Lancet Psychiatry.

